Should artists and authors be receiving royalties for AI models training?

This debate is about whether using artists' and authors' works to train AI models counts as a kind of "use" that should be paid for, like sampling music or reprinting a text. One side will argue that creative work is intellectual property and that training without compensation is exploitation at scale. The other side will emphasize that training is more like "reading and learning" than copying, and that imposing royalties could slow innovation and be technically very hard to implement fairly. Underneath it all is a clash between existing copyright frameworks and the realities of machine learning.

Here you can watch the whole argumentation in favor and against the discussed thesis

Yes (26 votes) No (6 votes)
Should artists and authors be receiving royalties for AI models training?

To vote

YES: Amanda Palmer

Agree Position

NO: Jimmy Wales

Disagree Position

Amanda Palmer

Amanda Palmer is an American singer, songwriter, and performance artist, best known as lead vocalist and pianist of punk cabaret duo the Dresden Dolls. She launched a successful solo career and became a crowdfunding pioneer, raising $1.19 million on Kickstarter in 2012—then the platform's highest-funded music project.

Jimmy Wales

Jimmy Wales is the founder of Wikipedia, the world's largest free encyclopedia, which revolutionized global access to knowledge through collaborative editing. He serves as founder and chair emeritus of the Wikimedia Foundation. He also founded Fandom, a collaborative hosting platform, as well as Trust Cafe, a microblogging and social networking service.

Our other debates: