Will AI automation allow people and organizations to achieve their full potential and release their creativity?

This final debate explores whether automation will mostly free humans from drudgery or mostly displace and deskill them. The optimistic side sees AI as a "co-pilot" that can boost productivity, open space for creativity, and help organizations focus on high-value, meaningful work. The skeptical side fears job loss, pressure to do more in less time, and creativity being squeezed into AI-optimized templates rather than genuinely expanded. At stake is our vision of the future of work: augmentation versus alienation.

Here you can watch the whole argumentation in favor and against the discussed thesis

Yes (13 votes) No (5 votes)
Will AI automation allow people and organizations to achieve their full potential and release their creativity?

To vote

YES: Inez Okulska

Agree Position

NO: Jan Holoubek

Disagree Position

Inez Okulska

Inez Okulska, PhD, Agentic AI solution architect at UiPath, researcher, engineer, and educator in the field of artificial intelligence with over eight years of industry experience. Recognized in rankings such as Top 100 Women in AI and Top 100 Women in Data Science in Poland, and a frequent speaker on major stages including TEDx, where she explains non-human intelligence in human language.

Jan Holoubek

Jan Holoubek is a Polish director and cinematographer who graduated from the prestigious Cinematography Department at Lodz Film Academy. He's best known for directing Netflix series including The Mire, High Water, and Heweliusz. His debut feature film "25 Years of Innocence" won over 30 awards, including directing debut at the 45th Polish Film Festival in Gdynia and best director at the Polish Film Awards.

Our other debates: