Should AI companies pay higher taxes because of their impact on the environment?

Here the focus is on whether AI companies, especially those running huge data centers, should bear extra financial responsibility for their carbon footprint and energy consumption. One side will argue that higher or special taxes could both fund green transitions and incentivize more efficient, sustainable technology. The other side will warn that such taxes might drive innovation and investment elsewhere, distort competition, or be unfair if other large polluters are not treated similarly. The debate connects climate justice, tax policy, and the true cost of digital infrastructure.

Here you can watch the whole argumentation in favor and against the discussed thesis

Yes (9 votes) No (9 votes)
Should AI companies pay higher taxes because of their impact on the environment?

To vote

YES: Paz Peña

Agree Position

NO: Luis Bitencourt-Emilio

Disagree Position

Paz Peña

Paz Peña is a Mozilla Senior Fellow for 2025, dedicated to studying the socio-environmental impacts of AI data centers in Latin America. With over 15 years of experience, she explores the intersection of technology, social justice, and feminism, working with governments, civil society, and international agencies.

Luis Bitencourt-Emilio

When recorded, Luis Bitencourt-Emilio was Chief Technology Officer at Loft, a leading Brazilian proptech startup, where he leads engineering, product, data, and design teams. Today he is taking the role of Senior Vice President of Product for GitHub Copilot.

Our other debates: